Hot Searches: ICC Rankings | Mohammad Asif | More...
Share Email Feedback Print

England v Pakistan, The Oval, 2006

Holding quits ICC cricket committee

Cricinfo staff

July 5, 2008

Text size: A | A


Michael Holding: "A lot of things are happening today that I don't want to be involved with, so I've moved on" © Stanford 20/20
 

Michael Holding, the former West Indian fast bowler, has resigned from the ICC cricket committee because he is unhappy with the ICC's decision to change the result of the 2006 Oval Test between England and Pakistan from a forfeited win for England to a draw.

Holding felt that Pakistan's refusal to play should not go unpunished even though they were not guilty of ball-tampering.

"I have just written my letter of resignation to the ICC cricket committee because I cannot agree with what they've done," Holding said while commentating for Sky Sports during a domestic match in England. "That game should never, ever be a draw. When you take certain actions, you must be quite happy to suffer the consequences.

"A lot of things are happening today that I don't want to be involved with, so I've moved on."

The Oval Test was originally awarded to England by umpire Darrell Hair after Pakistan did not come out to field after tea on the fourth day, following accusations of ball-tampering.

Pakistan had, at the time, been in a strong position in the match, having secured a first-innings lead of 331 and removed four England batsmen in their second innings. There was nothing at stake in the series, with England already leading 2-0 after wins at Headingley and Old Trafford, but the eventual forfeiture was the first in the history of Test cricket. The removal of England's win could affect their standing in the ICC Test Championship - they are currently third on 110 points, one ahead of their next opponents, South Africa, on 109.

The result had huge off-field ramifications as well. Hair went on to be suspended from the ICC elite panel, and though that decision was overturned last year when he took his employers to the High Court in London, the initial decision formed the basis of Pakistan's appeal for a rethink of the result.

Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Feedback Print this page
FeedbackTop
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Cricinfo staffClose
  • ESPN Cricinfo

Sponsored Links

NoPurchaseNecessary. Subject toOfficial Rules

At Cricshop

Rogers Business Internet

Citibank

and get a calling card

Cricinfo Cricket Quiz

International 20-20 special edition

The Cricinfo Daily

Our e-mail newsletter

Cricinfo on Facebook

Get the cricket banter going

  • ESPN
  • Soccernet
  • Scrum