Johannesburg - In an interesting new twist to the King
Commission hearings into dishonesty involving some members of the
South African cricket team, the judicial inquiry is now likely to be
moved from Pretoria to Cape Town - the starting date is to be announced later
this week.
What emerged at a press conference in Cape Town today was that
the current terms of reference are to be expanded beyond those
initially outlined when the judicial commission was announced at
the offices of the United Cricket Board.
Mr Justice Edwin King, who has been appointed by the government
to head the commission, with KwaZulu-Natal deputy director of
public prosecutions, Shamila Batohi leading the evidence, said
he would prefer a "less confrontational forum in order to get to
the truth" and that he preferred that the commission's work, including the
examination of the players and others called to give evidence,
be held in public.
Ngconde Balfour, the Minister of Sport and Recreation met with the
judge, recently retired as the judge-president of the Western
Cape and confirmed the judge had expressed his satisfaction with
the terms of reference.
At this stage the venue of the commission is to determined in
consultation with the Ministries of Justice and Sport but it has
been again reaffirmed that it is clear that Judge King prefers
the inquiry to be held in Cape Town, where he lives. This request
is being considered.
It is hoped the work of the commission would start sometime next
week. The judge hoped to make a preliminary report available by
the end of June.
Ms Batohi, deputy director of prosecutions in KwaZulu/Natal,
expects the public inquiry to be held in offices still to be
found in Cape Town. Justice ministry officials said another
factor which had to be considered was the appointing of
administrative staff for the commission.
Ms Batohi is at present working on cases in Durban and
as she is to handle most of the preparatory work, the start of
the commission's hearings may be delayed
Much ground work still has to be done with a list of witnesses to
be drawn up, and notification sent.
Justice ministry officials also said witnesses and their legal
counsel would be given time to prepare for the commission.
Mr Justice King favours all the hearings to be held in public and
as would be expected the disgraced former captain Hansie Cronje
is likely to be the first witness. Whether the hearings are
likely to be televised is another matter although if the inquiry follows
the same process as others, including the Truth and
Reconciliation commissions, it may be.
All of Cronje's teammates, including those who have retired, can
expect to appear before the commission along with members of the
side before he was fired for admitting he was dishonest by taking
stained money. Cronje has been in hiding for almost four weeks
since he read his statement on national TV in Bloemfontein on
April 13.
Mr Justice King said that guilty parties would be
prosecuted by the commission as this was not the purpose of the
judicial commission of inquiry. It was a matter of gathering and examination of
evidence to "try to determine the truth" of what has
been placed before the commission.
As the role of any commission is to make recommendations to the
government on the issues being probed, chances are that Mr Justice
King will spread his inquiry as wide as possible. What we are
looking at here is the terms of reference: to decide whether or
not Cronje received cash received a cash payment and why. Given Cronje's
admission in this case the onus will be
the "why" and not the "whether".
In this case the Mumbai benefit match in November 1996 is likely
to be added to the list of queries which at present have been
limited in scope from November 1 last year until April 17. It
suggests the first Test of last season, against Zimbabwe in
Bloemfontein, is unlikely to receive much attention. The Test
series against England, mainly the Centurion game, and the
limited-overs slogs in which Zimbabwe, England, India and
Pakistan played during that period are likely to be discussed.
It is strange that Cronje, having said on the fourth afternoon of
the Centurion Test that he was not interested in making a game of
it "by declaring and setting a target" did just that the next
day, and earned heaps of praise for his "bold, innovative and
imaginative decisions".
According to a Justice ministry official the findings will be
included in a preliminary report at the end of June after which
the government, most likely the cabinet, will make their
decisions and allow the commission to widen its scope. Mr Justice
King was eager to have the witnesses come forward voluntarily
rather than force him to use the more confrontational subpoena
methods.
It has been pointed out there is no immunity from prosecution for
witnesses; witnesses, though can refuse to
give evidence which could incriminate them should a future
prosecution arise.
Mr Justice King firmly believes the only way to arrive at the
truth would be to hold the commission's hearing in public. A
confessed "lover of the game" he is said to watch the game on a
small TV set in his chambers when there were less pressing
matters.
He has been described by colleagues as being "fair-minded and
uncompromising: not someone easy to be swayed by special
interests".
South Africa's top administrators, among them Dr Ali Bacher,
managing director of the United Cricket Board, are expecting a
bumpy ride over the next few months as the King Commission of
inquiry unfolds. They suggest the probe is likely to expose
deep-seated corruption in the game at home and abroad.
Dr Bacher has admitted the feeling of the public was now one of
cynicism about what they were watching in terms of players skills
at Test and limited-overs international games.
"The truth must come out," he said again yesterday. "We have to
show where we stand on this issue and I believe in the next few
months we are going to have a bumpy road . . . But the UCB will
handle this process very carefully."