'I wouldn't say I protect the coach. I support him'
Sri Lanka's cricket manager Asanka Gurusinha talks about his role, the team's captaincy and bowling attack, and their drawn-out transition
What tempted me back was when my very good friend Aravinda de Silva and SLC president Thilanga Sumathipala spoke to me to come and do this role. I just thought it's a young side which has got a few experienced players, but really not the kind of experience that a good team will have. I thought this is the best time for me to go and work with these guys and see how I can take them to the next level. When you have Sanga, Mahela, I don't think you need anybody like that. They run the training and are very strong leaders. I was asked a few years ago, about four or five times, but all those times I said no. But I thought that this is a good time for me. My children are also older, so my wife and I can decide to go and do something for two or three years.
They explained the role exactly - what it is now. It was for cricket manager - that was the initial part. And they said most probably after two or three months they will look at making me a selector.
It's a young team, and yes, they won 3-0 against Australia, but consistency was an issue. This cricket manager role, they could have called it "team director", like [in India with] Ravi Shastri earlier. It is a new role. When we were playing there was no director of cricket or anyone. Now most places have directors. If you look at football, the team manager is there and there are skill coaches underneath. I feel that's a structure that cricket one day will go into.
Yes, we have a head coach. We can easily say we don't need a head coach. But I think if you have the right person, it's good to have the head coach. I'm not part of the coaching structure at all. It's very clear lines that Nic Pothas and I have. I never go into that area. I don't get involved in coaching. We have a lot of chats. I think that's the most important thing - communication.
The head coach reports to me, yes. But the strategy is done by the head coach, captain and the team. I will give guidelines. If SLC's goal is to have a winning team by 2019, then I will give that goal to the coach, who will then create the strategy. It's like any company, where you have a company objective and then you work on it.
I'm not involved in day-to-day coaching, but with the team, I do work very closely if there are issues. On tour, I'm the team manager as well. If there is no tour, my role is as cricket manager, where I will work with high performance and look at players whom we can bring into the national team. I can tell the coach: "We need to look at so-and-so." Or we might go to high performance and tell them we are looking for allrounders. That's the difference. On tour, it's pretty much team manager and selector.
Graham, from the start, probably didn't agree with my role. He thought I was interfering. I thought I wasn't. We did discuss it a lot. I am not sure what he discussed with the SLC president or anything like that. My role was always as a team manager and I will give certain ideas. I am the chairman of selectors on tour. At the end of the day, I do make the decision on the team - on the final XI. But in my five months, I've never gone against the captain's decision. With the head coach, I wouldn't say I always agree with everything, but I look at the fact that the captain goes to the middle with the team, not me. I have always given the team that the captain wanted. During the Champions Trophy, the final XI, even on things that I didn't agree with, I always went with Angelo Mathews' final decision. He has to go to the middle.
No, we didn't have a single meeting without Graham Ford, if it was cricket-related. If it was administration- or security-related, we won't get Ford into those meetings. But anything with cricket or cricket selection, Graham was always there - even though he is not a selector in SLC's selection policy. We always had the vice-captain there as well. It was a team that discussed everything, and I never excluded Graham.
I think it comes down to the manager or whoever it is. It's important that you're clear with them and say: "This is not part of your position. This is part of mine. Let me do it and trust me." I do respect SLC's policies and all of that - absolutely. But when it comes to decision-making, I always do everything within my powers. I also have good relationships with SLC officials. And they do respect me for who I am.
We have a strong provincial tournament now. I understand that the club tournament is not that strong. When I was playing, it was a lot stronger because there were less teams.
Not yet. To me, it's way too early. I'm just coming up to five months. The other thing is, there's so much cricket happening, how many players are going to play club cricket these days? There's not many in the international team who would play. We need to give them a break as well, to recover. It's a bit of a problem right now.
Personally, I feel yes. But it's difficult for me to say what their thinking behind it was. There were very valid reasons. I heard there were a lot of injuries as well. If you look at it, we are working with a very stable squad. You can see that in the players' confidence. They are a very close unit. That's what I'm trying to build. That will create the willingness to work hard and win. Against India, I think we will stick to this 15-16 man squad for the Test series. We're not going to go out of that unless something drastic happens with injuries.
I'll be honest - it's their cricket structure that's helping them. It's an unbelievably solid structure. It's the foundations they put in place a long time ago with Rod Marsh. Starting that cricket academy - at Adelaide initially - was their foundation. They start very young, from the age of about 13, and they even work on their fitness levels, skill levels, and all of that. That's all monitored by Cricket Australia through technology. They pick the good cricketers in certain age groups and have certain coaching camps. And the players are held accountable even out of camps.
We will set certain standards, and if you don't meet them, you will not be selected. We can't do it straight away because we've got to first educate the players. We're pretty strict with the national squad - with fitness and all of that. We will talk to them if they keep going backwards. In the most recent tests we did, every player has improved since the last testing. That's something I was impressed with. The players are taking it seriously, but we need to drive it at a younger age.
We have a few spinners who we have identified and are working with, but it's going to be a tough ask to replace Rangana. If he decides to retire by the end of this year, we don't have a ready replacement, and that's the honest truth. It's like trying to replace Sanga or Mahela. You can't do it overnight.
Look, he will be an asset for us in the future. He's a young cricketer. We have advised him to start bowling a consistent line and length, so that it will benefit him and he will play more matches. If he is not in the national team for the Pakistan tour, he will definitely go to West Indies with the A team and get that experience. Bowling chinaman is a very difficult art - it especially puts a lot of pressure on your shoulders; not like a normal offspinner. He's not that strong a guy on his shoulders. That's another area we are working with the physio on building, so that he can keep consistently bowling that line and length. When you go to a game, the captain needs to be able to throw you the ball and say: "Go for it." He's got good technique, and is great in some areas. I think we have to look after him as well. If he loses his confidence, he will be lost to Sri Lanka cricket.
We are working on that right now with our fast bowlers. When we were playing, Waqar Younis and Wasim Akram used to bowl inswinging yorkers to tailenders and that's how they got them out. These days, you don't get tailenders. Everyone can bat in most sides.
I'm very impressed with Lahiru Kumara. He's just 20 years old. He's very raw, but he's bowling very closely with the bowling coaches, and he's getting that inswinging yorker going. It's not quite in the right line - in the Zimbabwe series it was a little on leg stump. But give him a couple of months or so and he should be getting it right. He is a guy who can go 140-plus.
It might be too early, but I believe Kusal Mendis is one batsman who a lot of people are going to be talking about in the next ten years. He's one of the most hard-working guys I've seen at training. He's very committed and always wants to learn. At a very young age, he's got a very good record.
We've set a goal within SLC about what we want to achieve in the next couple of years or so, but the structure will come from the head coach. The national team head coach will have a bigger say with the A team and the U-19 team as well, because it's very important that if Nic Pothas is our ongoing coach, he needs to have more say in the A team's and U-19 plans, because that's what breeds the players for the national team. We have given goals of what we want to do, but Nic and I have talked about what we want to achieve in the next six months, and on to the 2019 World Cup.
To me, he has been in the system for a while. The players respect him. That's one of the most important things for a coach. They trust him. He is a hard-working guy. Yes, he doesn't have the name of a top coach, but what he has done in this short time is really good for Sri Lankan cricket. SLC and myself - we haven't decided who the next coach is. But as the board said as well, Nic is a front-runner in our selection. As he's doing the job currently, it's much easier for him to prove it.
With a young side, you need to be a hands-on coach. This is a young side. You need someone who will hold their hand and take them to the next step. In two years' time, when the team is at that top level, you'd then need a coach who will manage their expectations and work on. The good thing is, whoever is the coach in the next two years will also change with the team.
Personally I've got about three enquiries from people. They've asked me what the process is, and said they were interested in putting their hands up. I read a few things, like Jason Gillespie saying he was worried about coming here. Absolutely - if I was on the other side I would be thinking like that. But at the same time there are a lot of coaches who would be interested in taking up a challenge. I don't see it as a major issue.
I think that's the structure that we have created. The coach will report to me, not the SLC CEO or anybody. I wouldn't say I protect, but I support the coach. My position was brought in so that I can stop the issues going to the coach. I deal directly with SLC, and the coach will deal directly with me.
I want them both to settle down, not just as captains but as players. If you're a captain who's scoring runs, it's actually easier to captain a team and lead from the front. When I say lead from the front I don't mean just in the game. I mean your attitude at training. That's where people can look at a good leader. Even if they have personal issues, a player should be able to walk up to the captain and say: I have this, I need your help. That's the leadership I'm looking for. Both of these guys will have it soon. We haven't put a timeline on their captaincy because I was dead against that. Why would you want to put a one-year timeline? He's the national captain. If his form is affected then absolutely, the selectors will have to discuss it with him. But let him get the team together and work with them.
We wanted a little bit of experience. Chandi is respected by the young guys as well as the senior guys. Upul [Tharanga] is the same. He's been there for a long time and even played with Sanath [Jayasuriya] and them. He's changed the way he trains a lot. He's very committed and trains hard. That's what I saw from these two guys. We can get two, three or five years even. Chandi is really young, and Upul is 30 or 31. Easily five years we should be able to get from them.
I think sometimes when you're not performing, that affects a lot. On-field strategies can be one of them. In the last few months, while I've been involved, I'm pretty happy with the strategy. Sometimes we've got to back the captain with some decisions they make in the middle. Even though we as past cricketers or outsiders might ask, "Why the hell is he making that decision?" I sometimes have to step back and appreciate that he is a human being that has to make that decision out in the middle. Yes, I'd like to help them through messages and so on, but I'd like them to make their own decisions and back them.
I feel that if you don't have enjoyment and you don't have pressure at fielding, training it is very difficult. When you're fielding you have to enjoy it. That's what I can see now. In the Zimbabwe Test I thought we fielded well. We still need to improve a lot, but I'm hoping we'll see that improvement very soon.
Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. @andrewffernando