|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
The second one-day international at Cuttack once again demonstrated the basic difference between the two sides
Woorkheri Raman
January 23, 2002
The second one-day international at Cuttack once again demonstrated the basic difference between the two sides. While the youngsters in the visiting side are keen to contribute towards their team's cause, the younger lot in the Indian side seem to be indifferent when it really matters. The chase at the Barabati Stadium was well within the reach of the hosts but they made a mess of it. The fact that there were short by a matter of just 16 runs makes it all the more difficult to digest. The margin of the defeat was reduced by the heroics of the Indian lower order. Agarkar was involved in a couple of fighting partnerships, but in the end the visitors wrapped the game up in a fairly comprehensive manner.
The choice of inserting the Englishmen in was a bit of a surprise as the pitch at Barabati tends to become slow and low in the latter part. Ganguly knows this particular aspect about the Barabati Stadium as he has played on numerous occasions there. Having put the opposition in, the Indians failed to drive home the advantage they had gained by claiming both the openers cheaply.
© Reuters |
Collingwood was quick on the uptake and he was almost perfect in his shot selection especially against the spinners. Not that he was averse to playing shots against the medium pacers, but shots he played against the spinners were all the more praiseworthy as they were the bowlers expected to torment the English batsmen. Vaughan is another batsman who has looked the part on this tour though he had not got big scores before Cuttack. But on the day it mattered, both Collingwood and Vaughan took it upon themselves to consolidate and take their team to a respectable total.
It seemed difficult to keep Collingwood out of the game on Tuesday as he was also instrumental in running Laxman out though the Indian stylist has to be ticked off for his lethargy.
There is a lot of talk about the run-outs being instrumental in India losing the game but the run-outs (Tendulkar's) were a result of some outstanding fielding from the Englishmen. After the unfortunate dismissal of Tendulkar, the middle-order batsmen played with gay abandon. Sehwag and Badani have only themselves to blame, with neither of them realising the importance of their tenure at the crease. The young wicketkeeper Ratra showed a lot of pluck and spirit in the little innings of his. He was ever on the lookout for singles and punished the loose deliveries without any fuss. In the two games he has figured so far, he has acquitted himself well and this is a good sign as the selectors are still at sixes and sevens in the case of the wicketkeepers slot.
© CricInfo |

Harsha Bhogle on why the Indian opener is among the three best young batsmen in Test cricket today
Raw but ready for Test cricket
Numbers Game: A look at teams that have produced the strongest debutants
'South Africa aren't favourites anymore'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on England's prospects, what impresses him about Tendulkar, and the free-to-air issue
Cricinfo XI: Sahil Dutta and Andrew Miller recall 11 players who made their impact on a big occasion in style
Inbox: The tournament requires a qualifying stage
Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.
Who is the best footballer in Europe?
Debate now on the new ESPN Soccernet Castrol Rankings Blog
FREE Cricket DVD offer at Cricshop
Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store
Rugby Union Autumn Internationals coverage
on www.scrum.com