Cricinfo Mobile
Hot Searches: Hashim Amla | Jacques Kallis | More...
Features FeaturesRSS FeedFeeds
Email Feedback Print

Life after the doosra

Practically one bad ball short of ending his career, Johan Botha does not really miss the most controversial delivery of recent times

Telford Vice

May 18, 2009

Comments: 11 | Text size: A | A
Johan Botha bowls at the SCG, Australia v South Africa, VB Series, Sydney, February 5, 2006
The man with an illegal weapon: Botha bowls in Sydney, three-and-a-half years since he was reported after his debut at the same venue © Getty Images

A bloke who carries an illegal weapon up his sleeve should look the part. Johan Botha is one such man. There's a glint in his slivered eyes and a grim set to his jaw that warns you not to mess with him and his doosra. It's this delivery - essentially the finger spinner's answer to the wrist spinner's googly - that the ICC has effectively banned Botha from bowling. To use the umpirese for being strongly considered to be chucking, Botha was "reported for a suspect action" during South Africa's one-day series against Australia last month.

The news loomed like a mugger in a dark alley for a player who had risen almost stealthily from mediocrity to the ranks of the respected. His star leapt into fully fledged orbit during South Africa's one-day series in Australia in the first half of 2008-09. He took eight wickets at 23.50, was the most economical bowler on either side, and showed himself to be a nerveless captain in his team's series triumph. Ranked ninth among one-day bowlers early in April, Botha is currently 11th and behind only Muttiah Muralitharan, Daniel Vettori and Shahid Afridi in the spinners' pecking order.

All that meant nothing when he presented himself at the University of Western Australia (UWA) to be tested again. The first time he put his future in the hands of the men in white coats and their protractors - after being reported on his Test debut in Sydney in 2005-06 - he spent 16 months out of the international spotlight finding a remedy for his squiff elbow.

This time almost everything in Botha's armoury passed within the 15 degrees of separation from the straight and narrow, which has been declared legal. The exception was the doosra, which clocked in at a filthy 26.7 degrees. To hear Botha tell it, the demise of his doosra is no great loss. "I haven't bowled it much in the last year," he said. "My other deliveries have become more consistent so there's less of a need to bowl it."

The umpires who reported him, Rudi Koertzen, Brian Jerling and Asoka de Silva, submitted 18 video clips to state their case. Not one of them featured the doosra. And no wonder - Botha is adamant he did not bowl the delivery in the match that led to him being reported.

That wasn't the only unusual aspect of Botha's latest brush with the chucking police. "I was surprised that the doosra was a problem, because your elbow flexes less when you bowl it than with the other deliveries," he said.

The doosra, it seems, makes about as much sense to many of us as Amy Winehouse might do anytime after breakfast. Vincent Barnes, South Africa's bowling coach, took up the challenge to explain the dastardly thing: "It's an extremely difficult ball to bowl because it involves a big bio-mechanical change in a bowler's action. You grip the ball as you would for an orthodox offspinner. But at the point of delivering an offspinner your palm faces the batsman, and the movement of your hand and wrist is similar to what you would do if you were turning a doorknob. If you're bowling the doosra, your palm faces you at the point of delivery."

 
 
"There are other guys out there who bowl the doosra who should be sent for testing. Let's see how they shape up under the new regulations" Mark Boucher
 
Crucially, Barnes said that "at some stage, you have to bend your arm a little". Botha concurred, but parried skillfully: "You have to bend your elbow to bowl it, but in my case it starts bent and stays that way."

Barnes also offered a fact that only a mother and a coach would know. "Johan's arms aren't straight when they hang by his sides. They are naturally bent at the elbow. He has a natural deformity."

Bruce Elliott, the UWA professor who is also the ICC biomechanist, had made an interesting discovery in his dealings with finger spinners. "He said he had found that a lot of bowlers from the subcontinent could bowl the doosra legally, but not Caucasian bowlers," Barnes said. "Actually a lot of guys bowl the doosra in the nets, but they won't risk it in a match."

Many a bowler would be unnerved at having their grip on the tightrope of legality reduced to a toehold, but not Botha. "One bad delivery could end his career," Barnes said. "It's a very serious thing, and as a team we've had to be strong around him. But he's tough, a thorough professional. The same evening he was reported this time we went through everything and the next morning he was back in the nets, trying to get it right."

Mark Boucher, the wicketkeeper who has to decode Botha's offerings from the other end of the pitch, gave a typically blunt view. "I can pick his doosra, but whether he throws it or not I wouldn't know," Boucher said. "Often when you slow these things down with cameras they look a lot worse than they really are."

Of course Boucher wouldn't be Boucher if he didn't take a swing at someone, in this case Botha's fellow practitioners of the murky art: "There are other guys out there who bowl the doosra who should be sent for testing. Let's see how they shape up under the new regulations."

Botha, who is of sturdy Afrikaner stock, refuses to show as much as a twitch of alarm at what still seems a delicate state of affairs. "You just get on with sorting it out; what else can you do," he said.

Finally a straight arrow of sense in all of this.

Telford Vice is a freelance cricket writer in South Africa

RSS Feeds: Telford Vice
Comments: 11 
Email Feedback Print
Posted by nishant_g on (May 20 2009, 03:22 AM GMT)

Its arguable point when a bowler bowls with a bent elbow and deceive a batsman !! and is considered to be illegal and sent for bio mechanical conclusions. The whole idea of framing such rules in such sport is not to spoil the spirit of it !! and yes the bowlers should not be bending their elbows. If that is the case then how can one legalize the most controversial SWITCH HIT which happened in the batting !! the justification from icc was, "the bowler has enough time to adjust the line and length while the batsman is switching the hands". So even when bowler bends hist arm when bowling a doosra, the batsman has enough time to get adjusted and play !!! howzzat ! Also, as the bowler announces the umpire "RIGHT ARM OVER THE WICKET" is just for the batsman's sake. Similar thing should be there for a batsman too. They just cant switch the hands while batting. Both the points are diverse in idea. but the point is, batsmen are less targeted than bowlers which should not be happening

Posted by mayurbaruah on (May 19 2009, 06:29 AM GMT)

What about PAUL ADAMS of South Africa itself?? He was like an octopus whirling and carving a niche for himself in SA Cricket...his bowling spread tentacles for batsmen to be caught in his net... His bowling seemed really cool stuff but i guess the bowling "arm" was BEND more than the legal flex ion allowed at "THAT" time in world cricket...!!

Posted by redneck on (May 19 2009, 06:13 AM GMT)

yes im sure the doosra can be bowled legally what i think the problem is, is when the bowler tries to put a bit more effort into a delivery. they try and get one to really turn the other way and thats when they bend their elbow too much! they have already changed the rules for murili! no more rule changes please! @adolfhitler89 maybe because australia have been the benchmark for so long that when bowlers bowl to the aussies they give it their absolute all and in doing so bend their arm that bit too much and therefor get reported. just a thought. ps as if you called yourself that!

Posted by Gyalist on (May 19 2009, 01:10 AM GMT)

Oh please!! Johan Botha played for Malahide C.C. in the Leinster League in Ireland in the summer of 2005. Even back then they were doubts expressed among the umpiring fraternity in Dublin about the legality of his action and he hadn't made his international debut yet. No one wanted to be the one to bell the cat!! It came as no surprise to us that he was reported the moment he made his international debut.

Posted by TheNJdK on (May 18 2009, 23:38 PM GMT)

Two things. firstly (and i really hope this isn't true) i think Botha may suffer from this as the batsman now knows not to worry about the possibility of the other one, they have less to try pick. I think Botha is one of the best things to happen to SA cricket in recent times, long may he play and long may he proser (and i pray to every cricketing god to smile on SA in 2011). The second thing is that i agree with robheinen. we have differing rules for full tosses for seamers and for spinners regarding the waist high full toss no-ball. now i'm sure there must be some serious fuzzy areas around the cut off for that particular rule, slower balls from seamers, quicker ones from spinners etc. if we are quite happy to live with this sort of grey area, why not apply it to elbow flexation.

Posted by PakiLegacy on (May 18 2009, 14:47 PM GMT)

I say just banned the Doosra until Australian bowlers are good at bowling it and their batsmen are good at picking it up. I mean...comeon. We all know that they will whine about it until they master it. Then it is an art. So lets save all these bowler's carriers and ban it until Australia perfect it. Howatz that?

Posted by Adolfhitler89 on (May 18 2009, 14:29 PM GMT)

Why bowlers get reported for suspected actions when they play against Australia? Murali,Botha and now Saeed Ajmal all of them were playing against Australia when they got reported for suspected bowling action. It's quite weird.

Posted by wiiCricket on (May 18 2009, 14:28 PM GMT)

Natural deformity has or has not, what I fail to understand is the fact that bowlers are being targeted more than batsman, showing the emerging forced supremacy for batsman. There are bowlers who are coming up with creative ways to bowl and scare the hell out of batsman but they are afraid they might be reported or if they become dangerous ICC will make pitches more batsman friendly. The inventor of the doosra, Saqlain, has claimed that you can bowl doosra with out flexing your elbow outside the legal limit which tells you that bowlers who want to learn it within the legal limit must learn it from the father.

Posted by RaidonR on (May 18 2009, 13:23 PM GMT)

Call me skeptical but a lot of bowlers who have been reported for a wrong action has claimed a natural deformity as a reason for the apparent bending of the arm.

Posted by Dupsie on (May 18 2009, 13:22 PM GMT)

Is it a coincidence that bowlers only seem to be reported when playing Australia? Murali and Johan Botha (twice) for example. Since none of the balls submitted were illegal and are all well within the legal limit, one can only infer that an Australian (famous bad losers) whispered a suggestion to the umpire.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Telford ViceClose
Telford Vice Telford Vice, crash-boom-out left-hand bat, sort-of legspinner, was never sure whether he was a cricket person. He thought he might be when he sidestepped a broken laptop and an utter dearth of experience to cover South Africa's first Test match in 22 years in Barbados in 1992. When he managed to complete Peter Kirsten's biography as well as retain what he calls his sanity, he pondered the question again. Similarly, when he made it through the 2007 World Cup - all of it, including the warm-up matches - his case for belonging to cricket's family felt stronger. But it was only when the World Twenty20 exploded gloriously into his life in 2007 that he knew he actually wanted to be a cricket person. Sort of ...

    Power to Pakistan

Peter Roebuck: The turmoil in the country bodes ill for the game, but there is hope yet for one of cricket's compelling teams

    'Royals 2020 purely a business move'

Switch Hit: Are global franchises the future of cricket? Plus: Steyn flattens India, and the mother of all games

    Nightmares on the road

The List: The worst and best performances by touring sides. Pakistan's 0-9 thrashing in Australia is right up there

    'Rewrite ball-tampering law'

Time Out: Sanjay Manjrekar and Peter Roebuck discuss the ball-tampering issue with Harsha Bhogle, and the way forward for cricket

Indigenous opportunites

Inbox: Expanding the elite game in country Australia

  • Twenty years of Tendulkar
Sponsored Links

Debate now on the new ESPN Soccernet Castrol Rankings Blog

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

Toolbar

Get all the news direct to your browser

Cricinfo Mobile Site

Our brand new mobile site