Cricinfo - The home of cricket
Ufone

Cricinfo Daily Newsletter

home Cricinfo 3D Audio Video Photos Fantasy Slogout Help and Feedback



Pakistan


News

Features

Photos

Fixtures

Domestic Competitions

Domestic History

Players/Officials

Grounds

Records

Daily Newsletter



 

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation
India v Australia
Bangladesh v N Zealand
T20 Canada
Stanford 20/20 for 20
ICC Intercontinental Cup
ICC WCL Division 4
Indian Cricket League
Current and Future Tours
News
Photos | Wallpapers
Cricinfo Magazine
Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings
Wisden Almanack
Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout
Daily Newsletter
Toolbar
Widgets



Pakistan captaincy crisis

Why did Rashid Latif have to go?

Wisden's Pakistan View by Kamran Abbasi

September 26, 2003

The Pakistan Cricket Board trumpeted a new era after the World Cup. There were promises of consistency, and even the whiff of meritocracy. One of the most impressive statements was about the captaincy. Rashid Latif would lead the team for a year, and in the process groom a successor who, according to the chairman of selectors Aamir Sohail, would be Yousuf Youhana, the new vice-captain. Sticking to this plan, of course, was too much to ask. As an eminent psychiatrist once told me, nothing predicts behaviour like behaviour.

True to type, the PCB has slung out its good intentions with its recent selection policies. Rookies have been thrown into the international team after barely a first-class game, and now Latif has lost the support of the board little more than six months into his promised year. Why did it come to this? Pakistan, under Latif, had performed with credit, given the plethora of fledgling cricketers in the team. Why should Latif resign so suddenly? The answer, according to well-placed sources, is not a single issue. But the main reason is to do with the selection policy.

Latif, it seems, fought an ongoing battle over selection. He disagreed with the vogue for choosing players with little first-class experience at the expense of better-established cricketers waiting for a call-up. This tension reached its height during the Bangladesh series, when the selection committee wanted to drop Younis Khan and Abdul Razzaq and selected players that Latif didn't want. Latif was particularly flabbergasted at the decision to play novices, such as Yasir Ali. He is not alone. Many former Pakistan cricketers are dismayed at the way Test caps have been awarded like charity handouts.

More worryingly Tauqir Zia, the PCB chairman, has remained directly involved with selection policy, and Latif was seen as a hurdle in the selection of players that the board favoured. An age-old flaw in the Pakistani system has been the uncertain role of the selectors. In principle they should be appointed for their talent-spotting, fairness, and integrity. They should also be autonomous. This is not the case with Pakistan cricket, so why pretend that it is? Far more honest to admit that the selectors are, for example, Tauqir Zia, Rameez Raja and Aamer Sohail, instead of playing a public charade. I don't see a problem with that: make the decisions and take the responsibility.

Sources say that these selection hassles undermined Latif's position, and the board effectively withdrew its support from him after he was banned by Mike Procter for claiming a catch that he had grounded. After that he was not invited to a gala dinner with the president of Pakistan - it's unthinkable that the national captain should not attend such a gathering. Then Tauqir Zia made some public statements criticising Latif, and questioning his future.

All this augurs badly for Pakistan cricket, and it is time for a rethink at the PCB. It is a simple enough principle that selection should be left to the selectors, who then live or die by the team's success. It is a straightforward enough rule that the board chairman should leave selection to his appointed experts. It is an easy enough concept that selection should be based on merit and performance and not just on connections or a hunch - or anyway, hunches should be the exception not the rule. It is basic enough management practice not to publicly undermine your appointed leader. But it is the simple, easy, straightforward, basic tasks that Pakistan cricket habitually fails to master. Nothing, unfortunately, predicts behaviour like behaviour. Watch out, Inzy.

Kamran Abbasi, born in Lahore but raised in Rotherham, is deputy editor of the British Medical Journal.

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Fantasy cricket: India v Australia and Bangladesh v New Zealand
Login to check the standings
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile



Related Links



Players/Umpires

Series/Tournaments

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Fantasy cricket - India v Aus & Bangladesh v NZ
Check the standings
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
Play Slogout - our cricket action simulation game
Two formats to choose from
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site
 
Sponsored Links
India v Australia shopping at Cricshop
Kit, DVD, books & more
Bet now on the India v Australia Test series
Fixed odds at bet365
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
The best online rugby coverage - Scrum.com
Site just re-launched
 


 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories