Warne Anti-Doping Committee hearing Q&A
Australian spin legend Shane Warne returned home from South Africa after it was revealed that he tested positive for a banned substance
Shane immediately notified the test results to team management and it was agreed that he be returned to Australia to deal personally with the issue.
He will receive all payments, pending the outcome of the hearing.
At the moment this is hypothetical question, and it is a matter for the tribunal to determine.
No. The ICC has distributed a statement saying that the issue with Warne related specifically to events that had taken place in Australia under the jurisdiction of the ACB and would therefore be dealt with by the ACB under the ACB Anti Doping Policy. The ICC's Doping Policy applies only to tests taken during the ICC Cricket World Cup 2003.
It is the second half of the sample Shane submitted on 22 January, otherwise known as the B sample.
This is a matter for the Australian Sports Drug Agency (ASDA) and Shane but hopefully early next week.
The drug is available on prescription and is widely used in the treatment of hypertension, high blood pressure and fluid retention. It is banned because it has the potential to act as a masking agent for steroids. It achieves this by diluting traces of the substance in the urine.
The most common brand name is Moduretic.
This will be determined over the next few days.
The three-person committee will be determined over the next few days. It is likely the committee will comprise of a person with sound legal experience, an experienced sports medicine practitioner and possibly a former player.
The charge is a breach of clause 4.1b of the ACB Anti-Doping Policy - use of a prohibited method.
Under clause 8.1 the following penalties will apply for at least two years:
- ban the person from selection to represent Australia in international competition;
- ban the person from competing in any events and competitions conducted under the jurisdiction or auspices of the ACB or any member;
- make the person ineligible to receive direct or indirect funding or assistance from the ACB or any member;
- ban the person from holding (or continuing to hold) any position within the ACB or any member (including as an officer or employee);
- require that the person remain ASDA's register of athletes for the purpose of out-of-competition testing.
Yes. The ACB Anti-Doping Medical Advisor may provide reports, statements and evidence to the committee which it may use to consider lowering the penalty.
The ACB Anti-Doping Committee.
No. It is closed because of the sensitivities of the issues. ACB Code of Behaviour hearings are sometimes open.
This is still to be determined.
If suspended he cannot play any cricket that is conducted under the jurisdiction of the ACB or Cricket Victoria.
Yes.
If required and subject to the approval to the ICC Event Technical Committee, which the ACB is confident in obtaining.
The ACB is still deciding if it will await the outcome of the hearing before it applies to replace Shane in the World Cup squad. A decision on a replacement player will be made soon after the hearing date has been set.
This will require the approval of the Event Technical Committee.
The player can come from outside the 30 and does not have to be a like-for-like player.
Yes. Notice must be given within seven days of the decision. The appeals committee will be derived from the National Sports Disputes Centre (a group formed by the Australian and New Zealand Sports Lawyers Association, Sport Industry Australia and the Australian Sports Commission).
Yes. Visit www.baggygreen.com.au and look under Inside the ACB. Click on Playing Conditions.