Cricinfo - India paid heavily for their reckless batting

Cricinfo 3D

Audio

Video

Photos+

Fantasy

Slogout

Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation

England v South Africa
Sri Lanka v India
Bangladesh v Australia
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours

News
Photos | Wallpapers

Cricinfo Magazine

Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds

Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings

Wisden Almanack

Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout

Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets

India paid heavily for their reckless batting

Erapalli Prasanna

February 1, 2002

It was a humdinger of a match at the Feroz Shah Kotla in New Delhi. It all boiled down to the final ball and only a fantastic save at the cover point fence ensured that England won the one-dayer by two runs. The Indians had been agonisingly close to sealing the series but their hopes were finally doused.

I find it hard to reconcile myself to the manner in which Sourav Ganguly's team lost this game. It was brittle batting under pressure that was to blame for the defeat. Having said that, I was delighted to see Agarkar make his runs in a pressure-cooker situation. The young man has had a wretched run of form with the bat in recent times, but on Thursday he proved his ability to fight it out when the chips are down.

Agarkar nearly pulled off a miraculous last ball win for India without much support from his partners. Anil Kumble's dismissal epitomised the dismal batting effort by the senior players in the side. When the situation demanded a cool head, Kumble threw it all away, playing a rank bad shot to be bowled. I think that Kumble's downfall cost India the match. Five of the Indian batsmen gifted their wickets to left-arm spinner Ashley Giles, whose bowling was not as menacing as his final figures suggested.

Whenever India chases a stiff target, they obviously look to Tendulkar to show the way. It is as true as broad daylight that the Indian batting revolves around the little master. Ganguly is not back to his best, and is finding it difficult to keep the momentum going during the initial phase of his innings. On Thursday, there were shades of the Ganguly we all have come to respect when he played a few scintillating shots off Giles. The Indian skipper, though, failed to stay till the end and see India through to victory.

Mohammad Kaif, for his part, gave enough evidence of his talent and temperament for the shorter version of the game. The same, though, could not be said of young off-spinner Sarandeep Singh and there was no denying the fact that India missed the services of Harbhajan Singh at the Kotla.

What Delhi also proved is that there has to be all-round improvement in the planning as well as execution, if India are to seal the series.

The England game plan, meanwhile, clearly revolved around taking quick singles, knowing, as they did only too well, the limitations of the Indian ground fielding. Nick Knight played a brilliant hand and was well supported by Marcus Trescothick and Nasser Hussain. As I have been writing in my columns, it is important for Andrew Flintoff to contribute a few valuable runs to the English cause. The beefy all-rounder's explosive half century played a major part in the English win.

With the series currently 3-2 in India's favour, it might be a shrewd move for England to bring Graham Thorpe in at number three. Hussain's attacking instincts should also help his resurgent side as they pursue a series levelling win at Mumbai. I have a gut feeling that the English fast bowlers might cherish the opportunity to bowl at the Wankhede Stadium which offers greater bounce than the wickets at Kanpur and New Delhi.

At the back of their mind, however, would be the thought that Sachin Tendulkar would be hoping to please his home crowd.