Cricinfo



Cricinfo Daily Newsletter

home


Cricinfo 3D

Audio

Video

Photos+

Fantasy

Slogout

Help and Feedback


 





Live Scorecards
Fixtures | Results
3D Animation






England v South Africa
Sri Lanka v India
Bangladesh v Australia
County Cricket
ICC Intercontinental Cup

Current and Future Tours



News
Photos | Wallpapers




Cricinfo Magazine








Match/series archive
Records
Statsguru
Players/Officials
Grounds



Women's Cricket
ICC
Rankings/Ratings




Wisden Almanack



Games
Fantasy Cricket
Slogout



Daily Newsletter
Desktop Alerts
Toolbar
Widgets







Indians were guilty of complacency

Erapalli Prasanna

July 10, 2001

I was totally convinced that India would fire in the One Day Internationals in Zimbabwe after the Test disappointment. It was evident that the Indian team enjoys the shorter version of the game more than the longer one. The Indian team's body language in the onedayers was totally different as they cruised through the first four games of the round-robin league. Perhaps the realisation that they had to bowl only 50 overs had something to do with it. Indeed some of the bowlers looked like having run out of ideas by the time their ten over spells came to an end.

I was wonderstruck at the type of cricket India played in the final. Ganguly's captaincy was below par and I didn't really understand the team selection either. Complacency is the worst mental frame one can have. It's been repeatedly borne out that the Indian batting revolves around Tendulkar and the way our top five batsmen played once he departed was ample proof of that. It was really pleasing however to see West Indies apply themselves and play to a gameplan.

On the contrary, the Indians looked cock-a-hoop and overconfident and every member of the team needs to introspect on the causes for the debacle in the final. Or else they will be guilty of resting on their past laurels. It's about time that the coach John Wright does some plain talking with a player like VVS Laxman who seems to be still living in the memory of his epic innings against Australia. Everyone has been praising our fielding for looking acrobatic and spectacular, yet the opposition scored 290 runs. What is most important is not how showy you are but how effective and that is sorely lacking.

I for one thought this tour would be without controversy. But the stumping incident involving Ridley Jacobs seems to have disturbed a bee hive, with little justification. Instead of Jacobs, the umpire who gave the decision should have been penalised in my opinion. By the same logic, isn't a fielder claiming a catch on the half volley also cheating? In fact Indian skipper Ganguly did exactly that when Darren Ganga swept Harbhajan Singh to square leg where he was fielding, but the third umpire flashed the green lights. Unless sportsmanship is restored in what used to be called a gentleman's game, cricket will become a robotic, mechanical sport in the years to come and administrators will rule the roost.

 
Post this story on your favourite website Email this page to a friend Print this page Feedback
Watch our daily Cricinfo SportsCenter news round-ups
Available on Cricinfo.tv
    Live scores, results, news, features and more - a click away
Download the Cricinfo Toolbar
    Live scores, news & ball-by-ball commentary on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile

Cricinfo Mobile


About this columnist









Related Links



Series/Tournaments

Teams






Cricinfo Products
Our daily SportsCenter news round-up
Watch on Cricinfo.tv
Scores, text comms & news on your phone
Cricinfo Mobile
Play Slogout - our cricket action simulation game
Two formats to choose from
Add a Cricinfo Widget to your website now
Portable apps for your site

Sponsored Links
The story of the 1983 World Cup (DVD)
Available now at Cricshop
Bet now on the SL v Ind & Eng v SA ODI series
Fixed odds at bet365
Follow the new 2008/09 Premier League season
On ESPNsoccernet
2008 Tri-Nations rugby coverage at Scrum.com
Live scores, news & more



 
Top 5 player searches
Most read stories