|
Geoffrey Boycott analyses the first NZ-India one-day match at Rajkot
Geoffrey Boycott
November 5, 1999
Batting first New Zealand gave an exceptional
display of constructive aggression. After the first few overs the
openers picked their spot with a mixture of classical shots on the
floor and thumping good length balls 'over the top'. The bowlers were
powerless to curtail the run rate because the pitch was so true with a
nice even bounce. With field restrictions only allowing two men
outside the 30 yards circle. Tendulkar did the only thing he could
which was to swap the bowlers around and not leave any bowler on for
long.
Sadly for India it didn't matter who bowled at which end or
where the fielders were placed. It was 'slaughter in the sun' as
Spearman in particular pulled and drove with ease. Left hander Twose
was a revelation as he got his right leg out of the way to make room
for himself and whack the ball into every leg side gap. It was almost
as if he was toying with the bowling. At one stage with Astle batting
nicely and the dangerous Cairns just beginning to tune up there was a
danger of New Zealand scoring 400. But Astle got himself 'bogged
down' consciously trying to make sure of his century and in doing so
ran Cairns out stupidly. Astle eventually got his hundred but at a
cost of doing India a favour of getting rid of the most destructive
batsman in the New Zealand team and slowing down his own batting.
After that the tempo increased again and with so many wickets in hand
the loss of a few didn't hamper the run rate. All it did was flatter
a few bowling figures !
For future games it is vital that India find two bowlers who can bowl
' at the death' very straight and in the block hole. Nobody does it
consistently and so length balls were being smacked for huge sixes and
the scoring of runs could not be controlled. Captain and bowler
should be on the same wavelength as to exactly what line and what
length the bowler will bowl. When the ball is being walloped all over
the ground bowlers one under pressure and can't always think straight.
May be Sachin has to be much firmer and tell them where he wants them
to bowl. Then they are in trouble if they don't do as he says.
India are notoriously a poor chasing side and if they were to get the
huge target then the guys would have to play 'out of their skins' and
would need some luck. They got some good fortune when Tendulkar was
dropped behind off the 3rd ball and then Nash went off injured after
one over. Ganguly made 7 glorious shots for boundaries but Dravid was
at his best. Jadeja with Singh got the team in a good position with
sensible cricket but just when the tempo needed to be raised Singh
holed out in the deep. From then on India committed cricket
suicide. Jadeja slogged one up in the air and was dropped. Bharadwaj
tried to hit his 2nd ball for 6! He never gave himself time to get
in and get used to the pitch or the bowling. A stupid inexperienced
shot was followed by Chopra dragging his foot out of the batting
crease.
It was daft cricket without any thought being given as to how to win.
It was a crucial period in the match when good cricketers use the
brains and lesser cricketers lose control Having said that even the
captain comes in for criticism of his shot selection. He and Ganguly
were scoring at 7 an over and India needed exactly 7 an over to win
the match, yet he tried to hit debut boy Styris over the top. An
unnecessary shot if ever I saw one, not one batsman carried on to
make a hundred. You can't chase big totals if batsmen make elementary
errors and nobody consolidates with a big innings at one end.
© Professional Management Group
|