Final of doom (23 June 1999)
When they stage the 20th World Cup final under the roof of Disneyland's Cricketdome in 2056, the last tournament of the previous century will get no more than a passing mention in the historical reviews
23-Jun-1999
23 June 1999
Final of doom
Tony Cozier
When they stage the 20th World Cup final under the roof of
Disneyland's Cricketdome in 2056, the last tournament of the
previous century will get no more than a passing mention in the
historical reviews.
Any world championship is remembered principally for its final
and Sunday's was eminently forgettable. Pakistan's limp
capitulation in 10.1 overs longer than is allocated for a single
innings was a tribute to Australia's strength but it devalued
the showpiece of the "carnival of cricket".
The two classic matches between Australia and South Africa that
immediately preceded it, and the certainty that Pakistan were
capable of far, far better, accentuated the sense of
anti-climax.
Happily, the semi-final at Edgbaston, with its frenetic finish,
is assured a place in the records as the first tie in the World
Cup and Steve Waugh's masterful, unbeaten 120 in the Super Sixes
round at Headingley will not be quickly overlooked, not least by
the unlucky South Africans.
But they were not the keenly anticipated, massively hyped climax
of the tournament.
Few semi-finals are recalled much after the event, whether it is
the 100 metres at the Olympics, the football World Cup or the
NBA playoffs.
It is the final that matters and the most vividly recalled feats
of past World Cups have been in the last match - the hundreds by
Clive Lloyd and Viv Richards in 1975 and 1979, the Kapil Dev
catch that inspired India in 1983, the ill-fated Mike Gatting
sweep in 1987, the fight of Imran Khan's "cornered tigers" in
1992 and the uninhibited brilliance of the lightly regarded Sri
Lankans in 1996.
For West Indians, interest in proceedings diminished as early as
the first round.
Inaugural champions in 1975, again in 1979 and beaten finalists
in 1983, the West Indies have now been among the also-rans in
three of the last four tournaments.
Only last time did they advance past the first round, losing to
Australia in that depressing semi-final in Chandigarh.
Not since 1992 in the three-way World Series in Australia have
the West Indies won a multi-team one-day tournament.
It is cause for self-examination entering the new millennium in
which the shorter game will become increasingly more prevalent
and important.
The situation is even more desperate since the 2007 tournament
has been assigned to the West Indies. There is a lot of
preparation to be done in the interim but nothing is more
important than developing a team that won't be knocked out at
the first hurdle and can genuinely compete for the Cup.
What the successful teams this time have shown is that you don't
get very far without proper preparation, dedication,
determination and discipline.
Australia and South Africa adhered to the basics, such as
running between the wickets, fielding and catching, and built on
them with their individual talent and all-round depth.
Pakistan, as always, were the exceptions to the rule. If their
running was less erratic, their fielding more reliable and their
approach more disciplined, they would have won every match by
the same distance they lost on Sunday since they possessed the
most gifted and exciting players.
But then they would not be Pakistan.
Australia, Pakistan and South Africa were the three leading
favourites and the fact that they duly arrived in the
semi-finals was, on the face of it, justification of the new
format.
In fact, there were obvious flaws as exemplified by the fact
that Australia were two balls away from elimination from the
last four by Zimbabwe who did not win a match in the second
stage, the Super Sixes.
Such a scenario is certain to be eliminated in South Africa in
2003 but with a mooted increase to 16 teams in the Caribbean in
2007, it is difficult to imagine a schedule that is fair to
everyone.
There were the upsets that add the necessary spice to any World
Cup. The two most satisfying, and significant, were Zimbabwe's
very first over their intimidating neighbours, South Africa and
Bangladesh's over the western "brothers", Pakistan.
Along with their win over India, it carried the plucky, but
still moderate, Zimbabweans further than they had ever been
before and to where the West Indies and the embarrassed hosts,
England, couldn't reach.
It was Bangladesh's first appearance in the World Cup and their
lone victory was celebrated by their large expatriate supporters
in England and by the 120 million back home as if they had won
the championship itself.
It would be a bargaining chip for their administrators pressing
at the ICC for full Test status.
If no more than half dozen matches were close enough to sustain
interest into the last five overs, not one was lost to rain and
not one had to go to the complicated Duckworth/Lewis method that
decides the result in rain-interrupted matches.
In an itinerary between May 16 to June 20, that was among the
most remarkable statistics of the tournament.
The weather did have an indirect effect in that it was mostly
cold and grey through to early June, influencing conditions that
favoured seam and swing bowlers using the Dukes white ball with
its prominent seam.
It was hardly the climate to encourage the "carnival of cricket"
that was the tournament's slogan. As it is, England,
particularly cricketing England, is not renowned for its
bacchanalian exuberance and it was far-fetched to expect the MCC
members at Lord's and the usually somnolent spectators at other
grounds to suddenly get in the marketed spirit of the Cup.
It took immigrant West Indians to spark the Notting Hill
Carnival, the most celebrated in this country, and it took fans
from less inhibited parts of the world to make this the
"carnival of cricket".
Wherever they went, Pakistan, India and Bangladesh brought with
them hundreds upon hundreds of their joyous countrymen, waving
their flags, beating their drums, blowing their whistles and,
occasionally, setting off their fireworks. England had never
seen anything like it.
If the other teams had fewer fans following them, Australians,
South Africans, New Zealanders and Zimbabweans added to the
revelry with their costumes, their banners and their sense of
fun.
It was not entirely new. Television replays of the 1975 and 1979
finals show Lord's packed with West Indians cavorting all over
the hallowed turf at every Lloyd four, Roberts' wickets,
Richards' six and Garner victim.
Now such West Indian support is virtually non-existent. Whatever
West Indian flags to be seen were waved mainly by those who had
travelled from the Caribbean for the occasion, not by those who
were there 20 years ago or their children.
Exorbitant prices (£60 a match) and sub-standard West Indian
performances were some of the causes. But the modern generation
of Englishmen with West Indian roots care little for cricket.
Football and athletics hold their sporting attention.
So it was a carnival without West Indians, either on the field
or beyond, but that didn't seriously spoil the party.
What did was the flat finale.
Source :: The Barbados Nation