Cricinfo Mobile
Hot Searches: IPL 2010 | Sachin Tendulkar | More...
Email Feedback Print

Australia v West Indies, 1st Test, Brisbane

No Hughes is good news for Watson

Alex Brown

November 24, 2009

Comments: 18 | Text size: A | A
Shane Watson flashes one square of the wicket, as another appeal is rejected, England v Australia, 5th Test, The Oval, 2nd day, August 21, 2009
Shane Watson is getting used to being the 'other man' in Australia's opening affair © Getty Images

Shane Watson is fast learning that friendly fire isn't always so friendly. Having spent the majority of his career pursuing a Test berth, Watson now finds himself in the uncharted waters of incumbent status entering an Australian summer - and the internal challengers are circling.

From the moment he was crowned Australia's new Test opener at Edgbaston earlier this year, Watson expected the likes of Phillip Hughes, Phil Jaques and Chris Rogers to launch campaigns to usurp the throne. What he hadn't counted on was the overwhelming push from his adopted state's media to see him replaced with Hughes, his New South Wales team-mate, for the opening Test against West Indies, beginning at the Gabba on Thursday.

With anonymity no longer his ally, Watson is coming to terms with life with a bullseye on his back. Half-centuries in each of his first three Test innings as opener might have afforded him a degree of breathing space but, cast as "the other man" in a regional love-affair with the swashbuckling Hughes, the prevailing mood is that Watson is a man pursued.

"That was definitely interesting," Watson said of the pro-Hughes campaign. "I didn't score as many runs as I would've liked during the Ashes, but I was able to make a pretty good fist of it. There has been a lot of pressure there from the media pushing Phil Hughes, but in the end I've got the opportunity. I've just got to be performing anyway, whether it's Phil Hughes or Phil Jaques or any other batsman in Australia pushing me. But this is certainly all a new experience for me."

Watson's place at the top of the order is not only a matter of debate in the nation's newspapers. Andrew Hilditch and Ricky Ponting have in the past week offered contrasting forecasts of his long-term place in the side - Hilditch extolling his opening credentials, Ponting viewing him in a more traditional allrounder's role.

''Down the track, we all think that with Shane's style of play, he would be suited down in the middle order and being able to give us 15 to 20 overs as well,'' Ponting said. ''That's the cricketer I always thought he would be. He can bat pretty much anywhere in the order which is terrific for us, but the difficulty that presents is how many overs are you going to push to get out of him knowing that he's going to have to bat at the start of the second innings?"

Ponting's point is a salient one. Over the past two years the world has witnessed the disastrous effects modern cricket scheduling has had on the game's leading allrounders - Andrew Flintoff, Dwayne Bravo and Jacob Oram have all spent extended periods on the sidelines with injury - and Australia would be reckless to expose Watson to a similar fate.

Watson, of course, is all too aware of the physical demands placed upon allrounders. Back, shoulder and hamstring problems were among the litany of injuries that prevented him from realising his potential for much of the past decade, but a revised training regime has given him confidence that the worst might be behind him.

Speaking at the Allan Border Field in Brisbane this week, Watson had ample opportunity to reflect upon the myriad twists his career has taken in recent years. It was at that facility three years ago that he sustained the Ashes-ending hamstring injury that jeopardised his international career. It is at the same practice field he now prepares to entrench himself as a first-picked member of the Test side, having survived and thrived through one of the most demanding years in the history of Australian cricket

"I wasn't in a great place there for a while," he said. "I thought I was going to have to give up being an allrounder. For me to play for Australia, I thought it was going to take me a lot longer to get where I wanted to go. Being an allrounder gave me an opportunity to narrow the number of people you're up against. I wasn't really thinking about quitting cricket, because I knew I had my batting, but deep down I knew the things I could achieve as an allrounder.

"I'll have to be clever about how I go about things, there's no doubt. Being an allrounder and seeing the unfortunate thing that's happened to Freddie and other allrounders around the world, it just rams home the importance of getting my body just right. For me to be able to get through the last six months of cricket and to feel really good and fresh after it, it's been very rewarding to know the things I've done especially over the last two years are paying big dividends. It puts my mind at ease because at a certain stage I was doubting whether I was ever going to get an opportunity to see how good I could be on the international stage."

And, so, to the next phase of his career. Having secured his place in the Test XI, Watson is now refining his technique to withstand the challenges posed by the game's elite new-ball bowlers. His successes in England were tempered by a tendency to lose his wicket shortly after breaks in play - either trapped on the crease or playing around his front pad - and Watson is working to sharpen his footwork before his duels with Jerome Taylor, Dwayne Bravo and co.

"It is such a big challenge opening the batting and just playing a lot of cricket back to back," he said. "It definitely has been a work in progress to work on certain aspects of my game. Some have come along quicker than I expected, but a few other little things creep in like the mental side of switching on and switching off every ball and not coming back from a break and getting out. That's the continual challenge and the thing I love about cricket. I feel that's a step along the way to making me a better player."

Alex Brown is deputy editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Alex Brown
Comments: 18 
Email Feedback Print
Posted by wato_90 on (November 25 2009, 22:44 PM GMT)

MAK123, as much as I agree that Cullum Ferguson deserves a spot in the the test side he is injured for the summer so I do not think he is much of a shot to get within the side. However Watson has proven to be useful and as much doubt whether he is capable of making a big score as long as his average can get constantly around 40-50 he is showing consistency which is needed at the top of the order rather than a century then a couple low scores. I'd much rather the opening partnership consistently making partnerships 50-100 which give a solid start then 150+ then a couple lows ones which can be seen in profilic high scorers. I believe he deserves the chance and he recognises others are knocking on the door. The beuty of a versitile player like him is that if they want a recognised opener to start a second innings they have Hussey and can slot Watson in at 5-7. However Haddin being picked again can raise some question marks...hasn't really found form since returning from injury.

Posted by Barnesy4444 on (November 25 2009, 11:48 AM GMT)

Watson opening the batting in test cricket is an insult to REAL openers. Blokes such as Rogers, Hughes and Jacques are justified in being annoyed. For a while the selectors have been trying to find a good all rounder, they finally find one and want to turn him into a top order batsmen?? Bat him at 6 and drop Hussey. If Waqar Younis was still playing for Pakistan, Watson wouldn't make double figures. Drop Hilditch.

Posted by here2rock on (November 24 2009, 20:40 PM GMT)

Shane Watson is underrated player. He did a good job as a test opner in England, a big score is not far away from him. He is a terrific player and a great bloke to have in you side. He has been very unlucky with injuries, enjoy your stay in the side this time around mate, Good luck.

Posted by maximum6 on (November 24 2009, 20:04 PM GMT)

I thought Watson was one of Australia's better players in the summer, and it was interesting to watch middle order shots being played at the top-far more styllish than the crablike Katich who seems only capable of ugliness, or Hughes who is off the wall. I am English so it was only a vague easing of the pain of having to watch him make any runs at all instead of collecting ducks, that they were stylishly compiled.

Posted by WJStryder on (November 24 2009, 16:20 PM GMT)

Im really not sure about the balance of the team. I dont think Watson is a test operner either, but how do you drop North for him to bat at 6? i also believe that Jacques has had a much rougher deal than Hughes. I would try and find a place for him in the top 3 and move ponting to 4. imagine pontings career record if he had batted their all his life like Tendulkar and Lara. I think aus have a huge problem trying to fit 13 or 14 top quality players into an eleven man team. whatever you choose could be wrong. .. whoever is picked - i wish them all the best! My test 11: Hughes, Katich, Jacques, Ponting, Clarke, Haddin, Watson, Johnson, Hauritz, Siddle, Clark Youre leaving out Hussey (based on recent test form), North (crazy), Lee, Hilfenhaus and Bollinger. They could make a few test lineups around the world heh?

Posted by cric_follower on (November 24 2009, 15:16 PM GMT)

Unfortunately the bowling quality present today lacks the penetration to expose players like Shane Watson and other switch-hit openers who can lack proper technique to open the innings. The Glen Mcgraws, Ambrose, Akrams, Donalds of yesteryears.. would have easily made his life very difficult otherwise. Having said that, he is the ideal man to open to take maximum advantage of such poor attacks, much like Virendra Sehwag does it for India. Although Viru is in a different class altogether. It is his bowling which makes Shane a much desired candidate over other openers. They have a bowling allrounder in Mitch Johnson and a batting allrounder in Shane Watson. The combination fits in well for Australia.

Posted by thewombat on (November 24 2009, 13:44 PM GMT)

If the selectors didn't have such an anti Victorian bias, they'd have Rogers opening (not to mention the even worse treatment hodge has received) and no need for a makeshift opener.

Posted by Majr on (November 24 2009, 12:02 PM GMT)

I am surprised that regionalism exists in Australian cricket, considering their professionalism and wonderful system for the game. Shane Watson is a very gifted cricketer with a reasonably good technique from what I have seen of him. This apart he has the Oz spirit which when defined would be that gutsy, abusive counter-attacking streak that makes Australian cricket so different. He is a good batsman and from the evidence of what we have seen is good to open. He has an appetite for big scores and has a fair range of strokes. It is maybe his persona and possibly some negative press that doubts are being expressed about his skills and committment on the field. It also surprises me that there is a campaign to bring back Phil Hughes. He is a likeable lad and that is the reason I do not approve of it. He simply does not have the technique to counter high speed quality pace such as Australia is on the verge of seeing with the stars from the Carribean already strutting their stuff there.

Posted by ihaq1 on (November 24 2009, 10:30 AM GMT)

it should also be realized that katich too has quiely moved into the opening slot although he too has performed unevely and teh australians should look at bringing their two best openers rather than playing two utility players

Posted by JackSparrows on (November 24 2009, 10:03 AM GMT)

I personally think that Watson is the way forward as an opener for Aus. for quite a few reasons a. He is in form b. He has worked really hard to earn the test call and lived up to the expectation. c. Hughes still has got immense amount of work on his technique which was exposed by Eng during the ashes. d. Watson fits in perfectly with righthand/lefthand combination which is pain not only for the bowler but also for the whole fielding side. I think Watson should be given the opportunity for couple series and then take things from there.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tour Results
Australia v West Indies at Sydney - Feb 23
Australia won by 8 wickets (with 50 balls remaining)
Australia v West Indies at Hobart - Feb 21
Australia won by 38 runs
Australia v West Indies at Melbourne - Feb 19
Australia won by 125 runs
Australia v West Indies at Brisbane - Feb 14
Australia won by 50 runs
More results »
  • Twenty years of Tendulkar
Sponsored Links

Play Lufthansa Fantasy Cricket and other games!

ICICI Money2India

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

Toolbar

Get all the news direct to your browser

Cricinfo Mobile Site

Our brand new mobile site