Hot Searches: IPL 2010 | Michael Clarke | More...
Email Feedback Print

West Indies in Australia 2009-10

Bollinger pops into first Test squad

Cricinfo staff

November 19, 2009

Comments: 60 | Text size: A | A
Doug Bollinger soaks up the moment after dismissing MS Dhoni, India v Australia, 6th ODI, Guwahati, November 8, 2009
Doug Bollinger is back in the Test outfit following his strong performances in the one-day side © AFP
Related Links

Australia's selectors have given their first insight into the possible make-up of next year's Ashes squad in announcing their XII for the first Test against West Indies. Doug Bollinger, the left-arm paceman, has been preferred over the more seasoned Stuart Clark who, at 34, is now facing an uphill battle to force his way back into the Test side.

Australia will play ten Tests against West Indies, Pakistan and New Zealand before re-engaging with England next year, and Andrew Hilditch, Australia's chairman of selectors, admitted Thursday's announcement was made with an eye to the 2010-11 series. Shane Watson, Michael Hussey and Nathan Hauritz retained their places in the Australian squad, with the pace trio of Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus down to lead the attack.

"We're very confident this young group going forward will do well in this very exciting series [against West Indies] but also we're very much in preparation for the next Ashes, which is only 12 months away," Hilditch said. "Doug is at the moment bowling really, really well.

Doug the diplomat

  • Doug Bollinger is not a man renowned for subtlety or restraint, but he proved himself a master of cricketing diplomacy on Thursday. Called into the Australian Test squad for next week's season-opening Test against West Indies, Bollinger arrived at the SCG aware he had taken the place of Stuart Clark, his mentor and team-mate, and toned down his exuberance accordingly.
    "[Clark] walked in and asked if I was in, so I kind of felt bad," Bollinger said. "But he's been really supportive and he's been really good to me. I am really happy with the news I've got, but Sarf's been such a good mentor for me as well."
    Bollinger's call-up is the clearest indication yet that he is firmly in the selectors' plans for next year's Ashes series. It also suggests Clark is facing a mighty struggle to claw his way back into the Test reckoning, despite another solid outing at the SCG on Thursday.
    "It can only give me greater confidence with a few more years left in the game for me and hopefully a few more overs," Bollinger said. "It's been good to hear that and it gives me a boost."
"It's a different form of the game, and you've got to be careful comparing one form of the game to the other, but he's just been very impressive when he got an opportunity in Dubai and then went to India and really came away as one of the key bowlers of that series. We think it's the right time to give him a chance.

Bollinger represents the only change from Australia's squad from the final Test at The Oval. His nine wickets at 19.33 on the recent one-day tour of India - highlighted by a haul of 5 for 35 in Guwahati - caught the eye of Hilditch's panel, which had previously granted him a Test cap for this year's Sydney Test against South Africa.

Bollinger's elevation over a fully fit Clark will raise questions as to whether the curtain has fallen on the latter's Test career. Hilditch was short of effusive when assessing Clark's Test prospects, although he did not rule out the bowler who won Man-of-the-Series honours during the last home Ashes series.

"We have very much an eye on the Ashes and if our assessment at the time is that Stuart is the best bowler for the Ashes and he's still going well, then so be it," Hilditch said. "At the moment we're preferring this bowling group."

Hilditch, meanwhile, expressed confidence in Hussey's ability in the middle order, despite a difficult 12 months in the Test arena. His fighting century in a losing cause at The Oval impressed the panel, and his ensuing form in the one-day series in India - 313 runs at 104.33 - convinced them to persist with a man once regarded as the foundation stone of the Australian innings. "The assessment is he's in good nick," Hilditch said.

The same goes for Hauritz, who held off challenges from Jason Krejza and Bryce McGain to retain his place in the Test side. So enthused were the selectors with Hauritz's recent efforts in England and India, Hilditch felt compelled to laud the strength and depth of Australia's spin bowling stocks - an unthinkable scenario at the start of the year.

"I actually think we're in a pretty good spot at the moment," he said. "Hauritz is bowling very well and getting better and better. It will be interesting to see how his confidence levels transform from one-day cricket into Test cricket. He's a very talented bowler. Krejza's made a lot of progress ... and he was definitely considered. He's bowling well. Plus there's a couple of young kids around the country we're watching closely as well."

Australia squad Simon Katich, Shane Watson, Ricky Ponting (capt), Michael Hussey, Michael Clarke, Marcus North, Brad Haddin (wk), Mitchell Johnson, Nathan Hauritz, Peter Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus, Doug Bollinger.

Comments: 60 
Email Feedback Print
Posted by A.P.B. on (November 20 2009, 15:49 PM GMT)

I very much doubt Bollinger will play unless there is an injury. I reckon they will go with Johnson, Siddle, Hilfy and Hauritz. Maybe Bollinger for Hilfy as he has been carrying an injury but I don't think they will have 2 left-armers. I don't think Watson should open, I'm still not convinced he should be in the team. It seems the selectors are hell-bent on getting him in wherever they can hence him opening. I call it the Gilchrist syndrome. A few years back sides all wanted batsmen who can keep rather than keepers who can bat (eg Geraint Jones). Aust see Watson as a Flintoff in my opinion. If they are so keen to play him, bat him 6 with Huss opening. Is a shame for Clark, but I'd rather see them get more games into the younger quicks, they're only going to get better. Hauritz bowled well in England and deserves his spot.

Posted by eyballfallenout on (November 20 2009, 03:47 AM GMT)

I agree with most comments, I have been frustrated with the selectors for some time. When will they just play the best team and stop playing for future series 12 months+ out. We need a proper opener,with respect to Watson, great player but opening is a specialist position and we have 5 good ones not getting a run. Also what has clark done, he is easy our best test bowler, he should be in the team. Katich Jaques ponting clarke hussy watson haddin Johnson hauritz Siddle clark. north and watson can come in and out depending wicket. I would put in lee for siddle when fit.

Posted by Strayan_in_USA on (November 20 2009, 02:59 AM GMT)

I think that Stuart Clark is very unlucky to miss out on the test squad. He is the change of pace bowler that can tear through an opposing side under the right circumstances. Without a true frontline spinner, with all due respect to a much improved Hauritz, Clark provides something that other bowlers, especially Siddle can"t provide. I guess there is some argument that Watson fills Clark's role, but he can't be expected to open the batting and take on the work load of a frontline bowler. Hopefully Clark can take a bag of domestic wickets and earn his way back into the side as the regular he deserves to be.

Posted by spewy on (November 20 2009, 02:29 AM GMT)

The reason Rogers is not in the squad is the same reason Hodge will never play for Australia again. They are both considered xxxxheads by Pointing the rest of the team.

Posted by paramthegreat on (November 20 2009, 01:27 AM GMT)

hahah "assessment" , Hilditch has been wrong in whatever "assessment" he has done. Dropping Hauritz for the final test in Oval ,continuing with Hilfenhaus in ODI's, dropping Haydos, Unnecessaily dropping Jaques, droping Krejza after one bad performance, making clark a scrapegoat, continuing with Clarke in ODI's(even tho he is performing hopelessly in that form currently), taking Cameron White as a leading legspinner to India(sif he is Warne!!), preferred selection of Haddin over Manou. What surprises me more is Hilditch continues to get away with such stupid and ridiculous assessments and he himself is rarely assessed. Pz

Posted by paramthegreat on (November 20 2009, 01:10 AM GMT)

i dont think the aussie selectors are interested too much in form and stuff. Well, bugger if i know how they make their selections at all. it cant be on the basis of age. If it were, Kato , Ponting shd have been dropped. if current form, Punter, Johnson shd have been dropped from ODI's . I personally think its the attractions a player bring to the side. Having said that, i think Lee was given a hell lot of a worse deal than Clark. ALso since they dont have any other player they want to take over as a captain NOW , Pontngs position is safe for at least 2 years, even if he scores at an average of under 40

Posted by virology on (November 20 2009, 00:28 AM GMT)

Presently, I believe too much cricket is being played. Ricky and Mitchell should be rested for the West Indies series, that will keep them fresh and increase their longevity. Doug should be given a place in the playing XI which would increase his confidence. Even Hughes should be brought into the team. By exposing him to a weaker team like West Indies will increase his confidence and make him good for a long run.

Posted by trininick on (November 20 2009, 00:14 AM GMT)

This is going to be a shellacking of the WI. But its important for the guys to maintain thier dignity and composure, especially the more experienced members. Sarwan has matured. Chanda want a 50 average. Barath will be a find. Remember in 75 Viv failed until he was asked to open. Lara came of age in Australia. The guys can learn from the patience of Nash. If they stick together as a team it will help. Gayle is not Worrel. Ive met Ramdin in Bermuda. He has potential as a leader as long as he believes. Good luck.

Posted by kirankerai on (November 19 2009, 20:43 PM GMT)

i think test cricket has became redicual in reading some of the comment and this article, i fell australia will lose that 1 status more often. i feel india, sri lanka and south africa will dominate all the other teams. this is because of daft selection australian make and england lack of passion and the rest don't even care.

Posted by calypsocricket on (November 19 2009, 18:26 PM GMT)

Hilditch and company is making the same selection errors they made against England in the last Ashes Series. I guess losing games is part of their preparation for the only thing that matters : The Ashes in Australia. I don't what it will take Cricket Australia to face reality. Hilditch and the rest of the selectors should be "dropped". They are not consistent in their explainations and reasons for leaving out a regular opener and a great bowler like Clark in a Test Match. It would no surprise if they have to keep losing 2 Tests to win 1.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Cricinfo staffClose
Tour Results
Australia v West Indies at Sydney - Feb 23
Australia won by 8 wickets (with 50 balls remaining)
Australia v West Indies at Hobart - Feb 21
Australia won by 38 runs
Australia v West Indies at Melbourne - Feb 19
Australia won by 125 runs
Australia v West Indies at Brisbane - Feb 14
Australia won by 50 runs
More results »
  • Twenty years of Tendulkar
Sponsored Links

Play Lufthansa Fantasy Cricket and other games!

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Buy now at Cricshop.com - leading online cricket store

Access your Indian Rupee earnings from anywhere in the world.

Toolbar

Get all the news direct to your browser

Cricinfo Mobile Site

Our brand new mobile site